REQUEST FOR QUOTATION

Available Sizes:

• 5 cm x 5 cm
• 9 cm x 10 cm
• 18 cm x 10 cm
• 18 cm x 23 cm

*For use by Healthcare Professionals ONLY*
​​​Registered medical device in Singapore.

• Information
• Material Request
  
• Demo Request
  

<

>

SUPRATHEL® is a synthetic one-time application wound and burn dressing for the treatment of dermal wounds.

The application of SUPRATHEL® reduces the burden for patients, physicians and payors and leads to excellent healing results especially when used on scalds and burns, abrasions, as well as split skin graft donor sites.

Just like a second skin, SUPRATHEL® effectively covers the wound. Due to its specific properties it enables a quick wound healing process and reduces complications. SUPRATHEL was developed with the functionality of the human skin in mind and thus shares similar properties such as elasticity, permeability to water vapor and impermeability to bacteria. This is the basis for the healing success with SUPRATHEL®.

Membrane Composition: Polylactide, Trimethylene carbonate and e-Caprolactone

Key Benefits

Significant pain relief – by up to 60% [1]

• Significantly less IV narcotic management required
• Minimally manipulative dressing changes with no anesthesia

Avoidance of infections, biologic risk and inflammatory response

• Synthetic, biocompatible, absorbable
• Minimizes risk of infection, suppresses inflammation. No reported allergic reactions

Faster wound healing [2]

• Reduces healing time for STSG donor sites allowing for early reharvest
• ROM can begin 2-5 days following application Lower treatment costs [3] - by up to 69%
• One-time wound dressing, no change of SUPRATHEL® needed
• Less care and aftercare needed, shortened need for hospitalization
• Less administration of pain medication needed

Good cosmetic and functional outcomes and scar quality [4]

For more information, click here for manufacturer product page.

Click here for SUPRATHEL U Training Platform.

​Manufactured by Polymedics Innovations GmbH, Germany

Literature
[1] Kaartinen et al. Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery 09/2011; 45(4-5):200-3
[2] Constant JS et al.: Wound Repair Regen. 8 (2000), 353-360; Rendl M et al.: Br J Dermatol. 145 (2001), 3-9
[3] Green H, Goldberg B: Nature 204 (1964), 347-349; Hunt TK et al.: Am J Surg. 135 (1978), 328-332; Klein MB et al.: J Hand Surg Am. 26 (2001), 847-854
[4] Wagner S et al.: Wound Repair Regen. 12 (2004), 368-373